Network Completion
Network Completion
City role: direct
The percent of each modal corridor (automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, transit, truck) that is considered complete, by length.

Automobile and truck. Network completion for automobiles increased to 62 percent by the beginning of 2015, while truck network completion increase to 69 percent. Segments of the automobile and truck networks are considered “complete” if they are in their final configuration, and do not have a reconfiguration project identified for them in the TFP or the Buildout Plan, which is the City’s long-term list of planned transportation improvements.

Bicycle. Bicycle network completion increased to 40 percent through early 2015 from 37 percent in 2013. Segments of the bicycle modal corridor network are considered “complete” if they are served by a trail or another type of physically separated bikeway, such as a cycle track. Bicycle lanes are not considered physically separated bikeways.

Pedestrian. In 2014 and early 2015, pedestrian network completion increased to 26 percent in Redmond’s pedestrian priority zones, and 76 percent in other neighborhoods. Pedestrian network completion is reported as 1) the percent of connections within Redmond’s pedestrian priority zones (Downtown and Overlake urban centers, together with the area within one-half mile of a light rail station areas) that achieve a high level of pedestrian-oriented design, including increased width and landscaping; and 2) the percent of the transportation network in Redmond’s neighborhoods that has some pedestrian facility present.

Transit. Transit network completion decreased through early 2015 to 68 percent from 81 percent in 2013 due to cuts in Metro transit service. Segments of the transit network are considered complete if they carry transit service that meets the City’s standards for that corridor. On “high frequency” corridors, that standard is 15-minute headways (the time between vehicles) between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. On “regular” corridors, that standard is 30-minute headways during the same period.

Source: Planning Department

Updated March 2015

Back to Connections / Infrastructure

Jeff Churchill

Subscribe to eAlerts Subscribe to eAlerts

Implementation Actions (PDF)


2006-2013 Annual Reports (PDF)

2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013

Annual Summary Pamphlets (PDF)

2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014